首页> 外文OA文献 >Technical Mediation and Subjectivation: Tracing and Extending Foucault's Philosophy of Technology.
【2h】

Technical Mediation and Subjectivation: Tracing and Extending Foucault's Philosophy of Technology.

机译:技术调解和主观化:追溯和扩展福柯的技术哲学。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article focuses on tracing and extending Michel Foucault’s contributions to the philosophy of technology. At first sight his work on power seems the most relevant. In his later work on subjectivation and ethics technology is absent. However, notably by recombining Foucault’s work on power with his work on subjectivation, does his work contribute to solving pertinent problems in current approaches to the ethics of technology. First, Foucault’s position is compared to critical theory and Heidegger, and associated with the approach of “technical mediation” (Latour, Ihde, Verbeek). Next, a detailed study of Discipline and Punish, results in the identification of two distinct “figures of technical mediation”. Finally, Foucault’s later work on ethics and subjectivation is employed to elaborate an ethics of technology that focuses on care for the quality of the interactions and fusions with technology. Hybridization is central in the approach: it is not to be rejected, neither is it the greatest danger, but it does deserve the greatest care
机译:本文着重于跟踪和扩展Michel Foucault对技术哲学的贡献。乍一看,他关于权力的工作似乎最相关。在他后来的关于主观和伦理学的工作中,缺少技术。但是,值得注意的是,通过将福柯的权力工作与他的主观化工作结合起来,他的工作是否有助于解决当前技术伦理学中的相关问题。首先,将福柯的立场与批判理论和海德格尔的立场进行了比较,并与“技术调解”方法(Latour,Ihde,Verbeek)联系在一起。接下来,对纪律和惩罚的详细研究导致确定了两个截然不同的“技术调解图”。最后,福柯后来在伦理学和主观化方面的工作被用于阐述技术伦理学,该伦理学侧重于关心技术与技术的相互作用和融合的质量。杂交是方法的核心:它不应该被拒绝,也不是最大的危险,但它确实应得到最大的关注

著录项

  • 作者

    Dorrestijn, Steven;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号